Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-1 vs M/s Burda Druck India Pvt. Ltd. – Section 79 | Carry Forward of Losses Cannot Be Pre-judged by AO of Relevant AY (Delhi High Court)
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, M/s Burda Druck India Pvt. Ltd.,
filed its return of income declaring a loss of ₹17.56 crores for AY 2014-15.
During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) accepted the los...
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3 vs Travelport Global Distribution System B.V. (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Attribution of Profits & No Substantial Question of Law
Facts of the
CaseThe appellant/revenue, i.e., Commissioner of
Income Tax (International Taxation)-3, filed multiple appeals challenging a
common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 13.10.2021
conc...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax–4 vs Klaxon Trading Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Section 263 Revision Invalid Where AO Conducted Enquiry on Cash Deposits
Facts of the
CaseThe assessee, Klaxon Trading Pvt. Ltd., engaged in
trading of metals including gold, filed its return for AY 2013–14 declaring
income of ₹59,99,560. A search operation was conducted on the Dua Gro...
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3 vs Travelport Global Distribution System B.V. – No Substantial Question of Law on Profit Attribution (Delhi High Court, 2023)
Facts of the
CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue
challenging a common order dated 13.10.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal concerning multiple assessment years ranging from AY 2007–08 to ...
Shri Chintan Bindra vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. – Delhi High Court on TDS Credit, Section 205 Bar & Illegal Tax Recovery
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Shri Chintan Bindra, was employed
as a pilot with Kingfisher Airlines Limited. Tax was deducted at source (TDS)
from his salary for multiple assessment years, including AY 2009-10, 201...
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)–3 vs Travelport Global Distribution System B.V. (Delhi High Court) – Attribution of Profits to Indian Operations & No Substantial Question of Law
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue filed multiple appeals challenging a
common order dated 13.10.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
concerning various assessment years from 2007–08 to 2014–15. The primary ...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5 vs Jaypee Powergrid Ltd. (Delhi High Court, AY 2009–10) – Interest on Fixed Deposits During Pre-Commencement Period: Capital Receipt vs Income from Other Sources
Facts of the
Case
The respondent/assessee, Jaypee Powergrid Ltd., was
incorporated as a joint venture to set up a power transmission system in
Himachal Pradesh.
The project was funded through:
Eq...
A.C. Surgipharma Private Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1) & Anr. | Delhi High Court | Section 115BAA, Section 143(1), Section 119(2)(b) Income Tax Act
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, A.C. Surgipharma Private Limited,
filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 2021–22, opting for
taxation at the concessional rate of 22% under Section 115BAA of the Income
Tax...
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)–3 vs Travelport Global Distribution System B.V. (Delhi High Court, ITA 718/2023 & Connected Appeals, AY 2007–08 to 2014–15) – Profit Attribution & No Substantial Question of Law
Facts of the
CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue
challenging a common order dated 13.10.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal concerning multiple assessment years (AY 2007–08 to AY 2014–15...
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2 vs Kony Inc. | Delhi High Court | ITA 669/2023 | AY 2015–16 | Software Licence Not Royalty & AMC Not FTS under Section 9(1)(vi) & 9(1)(vii) r/w India–USA DTAA
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue before the Delhi High Court
against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 11.01.2023 for
Assessment Year 2015–16. The respondent-assessee, K...