Anup Kumar Mittal vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-20 & Ors. (2022:DHC:3468-DB) – Electronic Appeal Not Uploaded by Department Cannot Prejudice Assessee | DTVSV Scheme Relief

Author
My Tax Expert
16/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 79
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner filed an appeal in Form 35 on 13 July 2016 concerning Assessment Year 2013–14. However, although the appeal existed in physical records, it was not registered or uploaded electronicall...

M/s M. J. Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd. vs Income Tax Officer & Ors (Delhi High Court) – Refund under Section 244A & Deemed Intimation under Section 143(1) | AY 2015-16

Author
My Tax Expert
16/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 73
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s M. J. Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd., filed its Income Tax Return (ITR) for Assessment Year 2015–16 on 11 September 2015, declaring income and claiming a refund of ₹11,27,4...

BIRD Worldwide Flight Services (I.) Pvt. Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 4(2), Delhi (2022:DHC:3466-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 86
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition was filed challenging the order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the consequential notice issued under Section 148 for Assessment Year 2017–18.T...

Fortune Land and Housing Pvt. Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1 & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2022) – Challenge to Attachment of Bank Account under Section 226(3) of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
16/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 123
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Fortune Land and Housing Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 05 March 2019 issued under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was not supplied to t...

Ambika Kapur vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Central Circle Int Tax 2(1)(2), New Delhi) – Delhi High Court | Section 148A(d) & 148 Reassessment Proceedings Set Aside

Author
My Tax Expert
16/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 146
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition was filed challenging the order dated 21 April 2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 along with the notice issued under Section 148 for Assessment Year...

Krishak Bharti Cooperative Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2022) – Lease Premium: Capital or Revenue Expenditure under Income Tax Law

Author
My Tax Expert
16/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 82
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Krishak Bharti Cooperative Ltd., filed an appeal against the ITAT order dated 29 December 2021. The dispute pertains to Assessment Year 2010–11. The assessee had paid leas...

Balesh Jain Sons HUF vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr (Delhi High Court, 2022) – Reassessment u/s 148A Invalid Without Supporting Material Disclosure

Author
My Tax Expert
16/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 94
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner filed its income tax return declaring an income of ₹10,80,404, which was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act. Subsequently, a show cause notice dated 17 May 2022 under...

GE India Industrial Pvt. Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2022) – Invalid Assessment Orders Passed Ignoring DRP Objections and Court Stay

Author
My Tax Expert
16/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 70
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged the final assessment order dated 09.06.2021 passed for AY 2017–18 along with consequential demand and penalty proceedings. The petitioner had filed objections to the draft ...

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax–3 vs Diageo Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. (2022:DHC:3680-DB) | Interest Disallowance, Business Expenditure & Sections 36 & 37 Analysis

Author
My Tax Expert
16/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 88
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Year 2012–13. The Assessing Officer (AO) had made disallowances on ...

Ernst and Young U.S. LLP vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. (Delhi High Court, 2022) – Reassessment under Section 148A Valid Without Fresh Tangible Material

Author
My Tax Expert
16/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 95
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Ernst and Young U.S. LLP, challenged the order dated 14 July 2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2018–19.The reassessment proceedings we...