Makams Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-29 & Anr. (2021:DHC:2463-DB) – Delhi High Court Quashes Duplicate Assessment Order under Section 143(3) of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
20/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 73
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner challenged the assessment order dated 15.06.2021. A prior assessment order dated 26.11.2019 had already been passed under Section 143(3) for AY 2018–19. Despite completio...

Skyline Engineering Contracts (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-22(2), Delhi & Ors. (2021:DHC:2559-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 87
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Skyline Engineering Contracts (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged the action of the Income Tax Department in recovering an amount significantly exceeding 20% of the disputed tax demand for ...

Smt. Shalini Goyal vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. (2021:DHC:4448-DB) | Delhi High Court | Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme Compliance

Author
My Tax Expert
20/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 78
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Smt. Shalini Goyal, had filed writ petitions before the Delhi High Court challenging certain proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department. During the pendency of these writ...

Rajesh Kumar vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2021) – Limitation in Income Tax Appeals & Effect of ITAT Relief under Sections 147 & 144 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
20/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 74
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 11 March 2020 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Sections 147 read with 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.The Commissioner ha...

Skyline Engineering Contracts (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-22(2), Delhi & Ors. (2021:DHC:2559-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 80
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Skyline Engineering Contracts (India) Private Limited, filed writ petitions challenging recovery of tax demand during the pendency of appeals before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Ap...

FIS Payment Solutions and Services India Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax 7(1) | Delhi High Court | ESOP Expenditure Refund Case | 2021:DHC:3845-DB

Author
My Tax Expert
20/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 68
Read More »
 Facts of the Case The petitioner company had deposited excess TDS, resulting in refund claims. The Revenue refunded: ₹72 Crores (excess TDS) ₹12 Crores (computational error correction) ...

Nimit Builders Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4 & Anr. (Delhi High Court, 2021:DHC:4480-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 64
Read More »
Facts of the CaseMultiple petitioners, including corporate entities and individuals, filed writ petitions before the Delhi High Court challenging issues relating to incorrect or disputed Form-3 issued by the Income Ta...

M/s Afflatus International vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 28(1) & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2021) – Refund of Excess Tax & Illegal Adjustment under Section 245 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
20/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 85
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, M/s Afflatus International, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for refund of excess tax amounting to ₹1,43,23,653 for Assessment Year (AY) 2020–21 and ₹53,85,886 for...

Interactive BPO Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 12(1), Delhi & Ors. – Refund of Excess Tax Recovery Beyond 20% Disputed Demand under Sections 220(6) & 245 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
20/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 78
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Interactive BPO Services Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking refund of ₹54,45,128/- which had been adjusted by the Income Tax Department. The adjustment was made against r...

Suresh Gulati vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-X & Anr. | Interest on Seized Amount under Section 132B(4)(a) read with Section 244A of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
18/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 126
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Suresh Gulati, filed a writ petition seeking directions to the Income Tax Department to pay interest on the amount seized during search proceedings, as mandated under Section 132B(4)(a...