Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, SDS Infracon Private Limited, filed
a writ petition challenging an assessment order dated 17.04.2021 passed under
Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act for AY 201...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Blueblood Ventures Limited, had an
outstanding financial obligation toward Shridham Distributors Private Limited
(SDPL). The petitioner contended that this liability was fully discharg...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner challenged the assessment order
dated 07.04.2021 passed under Sections 143(3), 143(3A), and 143(3B) of the
Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2018–2019, along with consequential notic...
Facts of the
Case
The petitioner deposited a tax amount of ₹19,05,21,564 for Assessment
Year (AY) 2003-04.
Due to a digitization error by HDFC Bank, the payment was
incorrectly reflected as pertaining...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, DJ
Surfactants, challenged the assessment order dated 13.03.2021 passed under
Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. A show cause notice along with a
draft assessment order was is...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s Geodis India Pvt. Ltd., filed a
writ petition before the Delhi High Court seeking issuance of directions to the
income tax authorities for processing its pending refund claims pert...
Facts of the CaseThe present batch of appeals was filed by the Revenue under
Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the common order passed by
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Years...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Sony India Pvt. Ltd.,
challenged orders dated 12.03.2021 and 31.01.2021 issued by the Income Tax
Department concerning TDS-related issues.The petitioner contended that the matter was
...
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court
under Section 260A challenging the ITAT order for AYs 2008–09, 2009–10, and
2010–11.
The
Assessing Officer (AO) made additio...
Facts of the
Case
The petitioners:
ESS Advertising (Mauritius) and
ESS Distribution (Mauritius)
were non-resident partnership firms engaged in advertising and
distribution of sports broadcasti...