Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Commissioner of Income Tax vs Sant Lal (Delhi High Court, 2020) – Addition under Sections 147/148/69A based on Third-Party Seized Documents Held Unsustainable
Facts of the
CaseThe respondent-assessee filed income tax return
declaring income of ₹2,91,670 for AY 2002–03. A search under Section 132 was
conducted in the case of Brij Mohan Gupta Group, where certain diaries ...
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-2 vs M/s BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. (2020) – Delhi High Court | Section 260A | Depreciation on Energy Meters @80% | Scope of Remand Proceedings
Facts of the
CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section
260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 challenging the order of the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 25.03.2019 for Assessment Year 2006-0...
Agilent Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(2), New Delhi & Anr. (Delhi High Court, 2020) – Refund Withholding Held Arbitrary; Direction for Immediate Release with Interest
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Agilent Technologies India
Private Limited, filed a writ petition seeking refund of ₹5,10,11,118,
comprising:
₹3,75,08,175 (principal refund), and
₹1,35,02,943 (interest cal...
Paradigm Geophysical Pty Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3, New Delhi (2020:DHC:1676-DB)
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Paradigm Geophysical Pty Ltd., an
Australian tax resident company, provided customized software solutions and
maintenance services to the oil and gas industry for seismic analysis and
...
Agilent Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(2), New Delhi & Anr. (2020:DHC:1700-DB) – Refund with Interest Directed by Delhi High Court under Income Tax Law
Facts of the
CaseThe present writ petition was filed by the
petitioner seeking refund of ₹1,27,09,392/-, which included the
principal refund amount of ₹64,63,043/- along with accrued interest of ₹62,46,348/-
ca...
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-9 vs Valvoline Cummins Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court (2020) | Section 260A | AMP Expenses & Transfer Pricing – No International Transaction Without Evidence
Facts of the
CaseThe appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section
260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the order of the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 26 November 2018. The dispute related to the
...
Agilent Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(2), New Delhi & Anr. (Delhi High Court, 2020) – Refund Withholding Held Unjustified, Direction for Immediate Release with Interest
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Agilent Technologies India Private
Limited, filed the present writ petition seeking refund of ₹4,62,93,053/- for
Assessment Year 2008–09. The amount comprised ₹2,91,93,395/- as p...
Laxmi Goel & Anr. vs Income Tax Officer Ward 36(3) & Anr. (2020:DHC:1735-DB) – Delhi High Court Directs Expeditious Disposal of Section 220(6) Applications
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, Laxmi Goel and Bharat Gola,
approached the Delhi High Court by way of writ petitions seeking relief against
inaction by the Income Tax Department.The grievance of the petitioners was ...
M/s BT India Private Ltd. vs Income Tax Officer (Delhi High Court, 2020) – Section 201, 156 & 271C of Income Tax Act | Violation of Natural Justice During COVID-19 Lockdown
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s BT India Private Ltd.,
filed writ petitions challenging orders dated 26.03.2020 passed by the Income
Tax Officer for Assessment Years 2012–13 and 2013–14.The impugned orders:
...
M/s. BT India Private Ltd. vs Income Tax Officer (Delhi High Court, 2020) – Challenge to Section 201 Order & Violation of Natural Justice During COVID-19 Lockdown
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s. BT India Private Ltd.,
filed writ petitions challenging orders dated 26.03.2020 passed by the Income
Tax Officer for Assessment Years 2012–13 and 2013–14 under Section 201 of ...