Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
650,244
Growing community

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs M/s Ravnet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Low Tax Effect Appeals Dismissed (CBDT Circular 17/2019)

Author
My Tax Expert
25/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 56
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present matter involves multiple appeals filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 against M/s Ravnet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. before the Delhi High Court.During the course of hearin...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs M/s Ravnet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court, 2020) – Appeals Dismissed Due to Low Tax Effect under CBDT Circular No. 17/2019

Author
My Tax Expert
25/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present matter consists of multiple appeals filed by the Revenue (PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2) before the Delhi High Court against M/s Ravnet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. The appeals pertaine...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax LTU, New Delhi vs M/s Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd | Delhi High Court | Section 14A r/w Rule 8D & Prior Period Income Adjustment

Author
My Tax Expert
25/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent-Assessee, a public sector undertaking, filed its return for AY 2011-12 declaring substantial losses. The Assessing Officer completed assessment under Section 143(3) and made disallowance...

Alcatel Lucent International vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. (Delhi High Court, 2020) – Stay on Tax Demand Where Issue Covered by Precedent

Author
My Tax Expert
25/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 72
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Alcatel Lucent International, challenged an impugned communication dated 20 October 2020 issued by the Income Tax Department rejecting its stay application against a substantial tax dem...

Tata Teleservices Limited vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. (Delhi High Court, 2020) – Refund of Excess Penalty Deposit Beyond 20% Demand under CBDT Circular

Author
My Tax Expert
25/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 70
Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE The petitioner, Tata Teleservices Limited, challenged orders imposing a condition to deposit 20% of penalty demand amounting to ₹293.28 crores for multiple assessment years (2006â€...

Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)–2 vs Micro Focus Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Software Sale Not Royalty under India-UK DTAA (Section 9(1)(vi), Section 260A)

Author
My Tax Expert
25/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 59
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Respondent-Assessee, a UK-based company, was engaged in development and distribution of software products. It sold software in India either through distributors or directly to customers on a princi...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs M/s M.L. Singhi & Associates (P) Ltd. (2020) – Delhi High Court | Appeal Dismissed Due to Low Tax Effect under CBDT Circular No. 17/2019

Author
My Tax Expert
25/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 55
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present matter pertains to appeals filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 against M/s M.L. Singhi & Associates (P) Ltd. before the Delhi High Court. The appeals were inst...

Paraminder Singh Kalra vs Commissioner of Income Tax – Joint Trial in Multiple Prosecutions under Sections 276C, 276D & 277 of Income Tax Act | Delhi High Court Judgment (2020)

Author
My Tax Expert
25/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 57
Read More »
Facts of the CaseAs per the judgment, the petitioner was alleged to have maintained an undisclosed foreign bank account in HSBC Bank, Zurich, based on information received from the Government of France. A search was co...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs M/s M.L. Singhi & Associates (P) Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Low Tax Effect Appeal Dismissed under CBDT Circular No. 17/2019

Author
My Tax Expert
25/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 65
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals before the Delhi High Court against the respondent assessee. During the course of hearing, it was admitted that the tax effect involved in the appeals was less than ₹1,00,0...

S. Kumar Prop. M/s S. Kumar & Co. vs Income Tax Officer Ward 26(1) & Connected Appeals (Delhi High Court) – Withdrawal of Appeal under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme Delhi High Court | ITA 537/2019, 538/2019, 539/2019 Decision Date: 25 November 2020

Author
My Tax Expert
25/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present matter consists of three connected income tax appeals filed before the Delhi High Court by: S. Kumar Prop. M/s S. Kumar & Co. Smt. Kuldeep Kaur Kohli (including as legal heir of La...