Pyramid IT Consulting Pvt. Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax | Delhi High Court on Transfer Pricing Adjustment, Functional Comparability and Selection of Comparable Companies under Sections 92C & 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 69
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Pyramid IT Consulting Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in providing value-added IT solutions and IT staffing services to global entities. For Assessment Year 2010-11, the assessee filed its return...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-6, New Delhi vs McDonald’s India Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Section 14A Disallowance Not Applicable in Absence of Exempt Income [AY 2008-09]

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 88
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Year 2008-09. The Assessing Officer had made a disallowance of ₹1,64,4...

Commissioner of Income Tax (LTU) vs Honda Cars India Ltd. (2019) – Royalty & Technical Knowhow Payments Held as Revenue Expenditure under Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 71
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue before the Delhi High Court against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Year 2010–11. The core dispute revolved around mu...

Kalanithi Maran vs Income Tax Officer (ITO) through Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax | Delhi High Court | Withdrawal of Petition Challenging Sanction for Prosecution (Sections 22 & 23 Context)

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 75
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Kalanithi Maran, filed criminal miscellaneous petitions before the Delhi High Court challenging proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department. The challenge primarily related to t...

Kalanithi Maran vs Income Tax Office (ITO) through Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax | Delhi High Court | Sections 22 & 23 – Challenge to Validity of Sanction for Prosecution

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 58
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Kalanithi Maran, filed petitions before the Delhi High Court challenging criminal proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department. The proceedings were based on sanctions granted fo...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-2 vs Blue Scope Steel India Pvt. Ltd. (2019) – Delhi High Court | Transfer Pricing | Section 92CA & 260A | Salary Reimbursement to AE

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 51
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Blue Scope Steel India Pvt. Ltd., is a subsidiary of an Australian company engaged in providing business support services. Due to operational constraints, a Joint Ve...

Manish Periwal vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. | Directorate of Enforcement (2019:DHC:7616) – Withdrawal of Petitions & Admissibility of Documents under Criminal Proceedings

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 51
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, Manish Periwal, challenged an order dated 28.11.2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Revision No. 225/2017. The revision petition had que...

Toshiba India Pvt. Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Deduction of Interest on Customs Duty under Section 43B of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Toshiba India Pvt. Ltd., filed two appeals before the Delhi High Court against orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning Assessment Years (AY) 2012–13 and 2013–14....

M/s Infonox Software Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2019) – Withdrawal of Criminal Petitions under Section 139(1) Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, M/s Infonox Software Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed multiple criminal miscellaneous petitions before the Delhi High Court seeking relief against proceedings initiated by the Deputy ...

M/s Kolahai Infotech Pvt. Ltd. vs Income Tax Officer (2018) – Reassessment Quashed Due to Incorrect “Reasons to Believe” under Sections 147/148 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
27/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 50
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner company challenged a reassessment notice issued under Sections 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act. The notice was based on information received from a survey conducted under Section 133A...