Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Aradhana Foods and Juices Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Section 40A(2)(b), Section 260A | Remand of Issues on Related Party Transactions, Fixed Assets & Depreciation
Facts of the
CaseThe appellant-assessee, Aradhana Foods and Juices
Pvt. Ltd., engaged in manufacturing and trading of aerated and non-aerated
beverages, filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961
ch...
Aradhana Foods and Juices Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (2018:DHC:8302-DB) – Remand on Operating Expenses & Re-examination of Depreciation on Bottles and Crates under Section 260A of Income Tax Act
Facts of the
CaseThe appellant-assessee, Aradhana Foods and Juices
Pvt. Ltd., filed appeals before the Delhi High Court challenging a common order
passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Year...
Aradhana Foods and Juices Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Remand on Depreciation of Bottles & Crates and Disallowance of Expenses under Section 260A
Facts of the
CaseThe present case pertains to appeals filed by the assessee,
Aradhana Foods and Juices Pvt. Ltd., before the Delhi High Court under Section
260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the order of the...
Aradhana Drinks and Beverages Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Depreciation on Bottles & Crates and Remand of Operating Expenses u/s 260A Income Tax Act
Facts of the
CaseThe appellant-assessee, Aradhana Drinks and
Beverages Pvt. Ltd., filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)
dated 0...
Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs MSD Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court on Validity of Stay of Demand under Section 254(2A) of the Income Tax Act
Facts
of the CaseThe
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had earlier adjudicated cross-appeals filed by
both the Revenue and the assessee through its order dated 22 November 2016.Both
parties challenged the Tribunal’s or...
Aditya Sharma vs Income Tax Department | Delhi High Court | Settlement Commission Proceedings under Sections 245C, 245D, 245F & 245H of Income Tax Act Do Not Bar Criminal Prosecution under Sections 277 & 278 Income Tax Act and Sections 177, 181, 193, 196, 120B IP
Facts of the
Case
Search and seizure operations were conducted on 15.02.2014 at
premises connected with the accused persons.
Multiple lockers were discovered, including lockers operated in the
petitione...
Aradhana Drinks and Beverages Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Depreciation on Bottles & Crates and Remand of Operating Expenses under Section 260A
Facts of the
CaseThe appellant-assessee, Aradhana Drinks and
Beverages Pvt. Ltd., filed appeals before the Delhi High Court under Section
260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the order of the Income Tax
Appel...
Aradhana Drinks and Beverages Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Section 260A | Depreciation on Bottles & Crates and Disallowance of Expenses
Facts of the
CaseThe appellant-assessee, Aradhana Drinks and
Beverages Pvt. Ltd., filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)
dated 0...
Aradhana Drinks and Beverages Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (2018) – Delhi High Court | Depreciation on Bottles & Crates and Remand under Section 260A
Facts of the
Case
The assessee, Aradhana Drinks and Beverages Pvt. Ltd., filed
appeals against the ITAT order dated 05.06.2017 for AY 2008-09 and
2009-10.
The Tribunal had remanded issues relating to:
...
Aradhana Foods and Juices Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) – Depreciation on Bottles & Crates and Remand of Operating Expenses under Section 260A
Facts of the
CaseThe appellant-assessee, Aradhana Foods and
Juices Pvt. Ltd., filed appeals before the Delhi High Court under Section
260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the common order of the Income
Tax Ap...