Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs Chintels India Ltd | Delhi High Court | Low Tax Effect Appeal Dismissed under CBDT Circular No. 3/2018
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central-2) filed appeals against the respondent, Chintels India Ltd. However,
during the hearing, counsel for the Revenue submitted that the tax effec...
Ramesh Chandra & Anr. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Reassessment u/s 147/148 Invalid Without Opportunity of Hearing under Section 153(3) Explanation 3
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, Ramesh Chandra and Sanjay Chandra,
filed writ petitions challenging reassessment notices and orders issued under
Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2009–10. The dispute o...
Ramesh Chandra & Anr. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (2018) – Reassessment Beyond Limitation Without Hearing Held Invalid | Delhi High Court Section 147
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, Ramesh Chandra and Sanjay Chandra,
filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking
quashing of reassessment notice dated 30.03.2017 and order dated 02.05.2...
Prabhat Agarwal vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, W.P.(C) 8907/2008, Delhi High Court (2018) – Invalid Reassessment due to Non-Recording of Reasons under Section 148(2) of Income Tax Act
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner (assessee) filed his return for AY
2004–05 declaring substantial income including long-term capital gains arising
from sale of mutual funds and shares. The Assessing Officer issued a ...
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central–2 vs Adarsh Kumar | Delhi High Court | Low Tax Effect Appeal Dismissed under CBDT Circular No. 3/2018
Facts of the
CaseAs per the order dated 17.08.2018 (page 1), the
Revenue filed multiple appeals before the Delhi High Court against the
respondent assessee. During the hearing, the counsel for the Revenue submitted
t...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-2 vs Adarsh Kumar | Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 | CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 on Low Tax Effect Appeals | Delhi High Court
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue filed appeals before the Delhi High
Court against the respondent/assessee, Adarsh Kumar, challenging issues arising
under the Income-tax Act, 1961. During the hearing, counsel appearing fo...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-2 vs Adarsh Kumar (Delhi High Court) – Appeals Dismissed Due to Low Tax Effect under CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 | Section 260A Income Tax Act
Facts
of the Case
The Revenue
preferred three connected income tax appeals before the Delhi High Court.
The appeals
involved tax effect below Rs. 50 lakh.
During the course
of hearing, counsel ...
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi–1 vs AT & T Global Network Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. | Section 153, 142(2A), 144C, 260A Income Tax Act – Limitation & Special Audit Exclusion Case Law
Facts of the
CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue under
Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning Assessment Year 2008–09.The assess...
Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs MSD Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court on Validity of ITAT Stay Order under Section 254(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 196
Facts of the
Case
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had earlier adjudicated cross
appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee by order dated 22
November 2016.
Both parties challenged the Tribunal...
Aradhana Foods and Juices Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2018) – Depreciation on Bottles & Crates and Remand of Operating Expenses Issue under Section 260A
Facts of the
CaseThe appellant-assessee, Aradhana Foods and
Juices Pvt. Ltd., filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated
05.06...